10std. ANALYTICAL PARAGRAPH (ITINERARY)

 ANALYTICAL PARAGRAPH (ITINERARY)

Key Points To Consider

Begin like this : A thorough analysis of the itinerary provided by the tour organizing vendor reveals that the tour proposal should be accepted / rejected.

Mention the most important reason why the tour proposal should be accepted/rejected. Mention the second reason why the tour proposal should be accepted/rejected.Mention the third reason why the tour proposal should be accepted/rejected

Mention the fourth reason why the tour proposal should be accepted/rejected

Conclude the paragraph by mentioning all the relevant facts. You may end the paragraph like this "Therefore, the tour proposal for the educational trip should be approved / rejected.

A Sample Question 

As the Captain of the school's Cultural Club, you have been asked to study the given itinerary provided by a tour- organizing vendor.

A 3N/2D Educational Tour for the Senior School Students:

Jabalpur and Ranha National Park (Vandhya Pradesh)

• Tour Travel & sightseeing by bus.

• Accommodation on quad sharing basis.

• One staff complimentary for every 20 students.

• Bottled mineral water throughout the tour

•  Celebration on 22 November.

• Insurance policy of 20,000/- per head.

• Provision of Tour Manager's assistance to all places

You may begin like this : A thorough analysis of the itinerary provided by the tour organising vendor reveals that the tour proposal should be accepted / rejected.

You may end like this: Therefore, the tour proposal for the educational trip should be approved / rejected.

Answer:

ACCEPTING THE PROPOSAL

A thorough analysis of the itinerary provided by the tour organizing vendor reveals that the tour proposal should be accepted. The provided itinerary for the 3N/2D Educational Tour to Jabalpur and Ranha National Park in Vandhya Pradesh appears to be well-structured, with several features that prioritize the students' safety, interests, and physical wellness.

Firstly, the inclusion of travel and sightseeing by bus is a safe and convenient mode of transportation, ensuring that students are comfortable during the journey.  Accommodation on a quad- sharing basis not only encourages teamwork and bonding among students but also ensures their safety in a group setting.Additionally, the provision of one staff member for every 20 students enhances supervision and emergency response capabilities, further promoting safety. The inclusion of bottled mineral water throughout the tour prioritizes the students' physical wellness by keeping them hydrated. 

Moreover, the insurance policy of ₹20,000/- per head demonstrates the tour organizer's commitment to student safety in case of unforeseen events. Finally, the Dance Party on 22 November adds an element of fun and interest for the students, making the tour more engaging and memorable.

Overall, this itinerary seems well- rounded, balancing safety, physical wellness, and student interests, making it suitable for approval for the Senior School Students' Educational Tour. Therefore, the tour proposal for the educational trip should be approved.

REJECTING THE PROPOSAL

A thorough analysis of the itinerary provided by the tour organizing vendor reveals that the tour proposal should be rejected due to significant concerns related to the students' safety, interest, and physical wellness

Firstly, the duration of the tour, being only 2 days, appears rushed and hectic f or an educational trip. This limited time frame may not allow students to fully engage with the educational and cultural aspects of the destinations, undermining their interest and learning experience. Quad-sharing accommodation may compromise privacy and security, and no mention is made of any medical facilities or first-aid provisions on the tour. Additionally, the tour seems more recreational than educational. Hence, I recommend a thorough review to make it recreational than educational. Hence, I recommend a thorough review to make it more student-centric, safe, and educational.

 Additionally, the inclusion of a Dance Party on 22 November seems inappropriate for an educational tour, as it may divert the focus away from the primary purpose of learning and cultural exposure. Furthermore, while the provision of one staff member for every 20 students is a safety measure, it might still be insufficient for ensuring the well-being of all students, especially in a new and unfamiliar location.

Overall, the itinerary lacks a balanced emphasis on students' safety, educational interests, and physical wellness, making it unsuitable for approval for the Senior School Students' Educational Tour. Therefore, the tour proposal for the educational trip should be rejected.